03.01.2025 13:18
PROCESS MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK
Traditional Sports and Games Application and Research Center
2023
C.3 Research Performance Main Process
Main Process Officers:
Academic unit managers and coordinators
Main Process Implementers
All academic staff and relevant administrative staff
Scope and Purpose of the Main Process
The research activities of the institution are monitored and evaluated on an annual basis, compared with the targets and the reasons for deviations are analyzed. Systematic analysis of the institution's focus areas within the university, awareness outside the university, international visibility, analysis of the issues of claiming expertise, and compliance with the targets are systematically analyzed. Incentive and recognition mechanisms are used on the basis of performance. Competition with competitors and benchmarking with selected institutions are monitored. Performance evaluations are ensured to be systematic and permanent.
Main Process Inputs
Relevant legal and regulatory documents, board and commission decisions, meeting minutes and stakeholder opinions
Sub Processes
C.3.1.Monitoring and evaluation of research performance
C.3.2 Evaluation of faculty/researcher performance
Main Process Outputs
Board and commission decisions, plans, programs, activities, news about the activity, photos, signature lists
Main Process Performance Indicators
Number of activities organized by application and research centers
Customer of the Main Process
All employees of the university, students, other stakeholders.
Supplier of the Main ProcessAll academic and administrative units, students, stakeholdersProcess Name: C.3.1. Monitoring and Evaluation of Research Performance
C.3.1. Monitoring and Evaluation of Research Performance Sub-Process
Top Process:
C.3. Research Performance
Sub Process Implementers
All academic staff and relevant administrative staff
Scope and Purpose of the Sub-Process
The research activities of the institution are monitored and evaluated on an annual basis, compared with the targets and the reasons for deviations are analyzed. Systematic analysis of the institution's focus areas within the university, awareness outside the university, international visibility, analysis of the issues of claiming expertise, and compliance with the targets are systematically analyzed. Incentive and recognition mechanisms are used on the basis of performance. Competition with competitors and benchmarking with selected institutions are monitored. Ensuring that performance evaluations are systematic and permanent
Sub Process Inputs
Board Decisions, Commission Decisions, Request Letters regarding planning
Sub Processes Activities
Monitoring and evaluation of research performance on an annual basis,
Evaluation of research performance and improvement based on results
Annual monitoring and evaluation of the institution's research activities
Competition with competitors, benchmarking with selected institutions
Sub Process Outputs
News about the activity, photos, signature lists
Performance Indicators of Sub-Process
Number of activities organized by application and research centers
Process Name: C.3.2. Evaluation of Instructor/Researcher Performance
C.3.2. Evaluation of Instructor/Researcher Performance
Top Process:
C.3. Research Performance
Sub Process Implementers
All academic staff and relevant administrative staff
Scope and Purpose of the Sub-Process
Faculty members sharing their research performance
expected; there are defined processes governing this and these are known to relevant stakeholders. Research performance is monitored and evaluated on an annual basis and used in line with institutional policies. Outputs, group averages and breakdown are shared transparently. Performance evaluations were ensured to be systematic and permanent.
Sub Process Inputs
Board Decisions, Commission Decisions, Request Letters regarding planning
Sub Processes Activities
Instructor performance evaluation
Monitoring and evaluation of research performance on an annual basis,
Evaluation of research performance and improvement based on results
Annual monitoring and evaluation of the institution's research activities
Competition with competitors, benchmarking with selected institutions
Sub Process Outputs
News about the activity, photos, signature lists
Performance Indicators of Sub-Process
Number of activities organized by application and research centers
Average annual number of publications in journals per faculty member
Customer of the Sub-Process
All employees of the university, students, other stakeholders.
Supplier of Sub-Process
All academic and administrative units, students, stakeholders
Process Name: D.1. Management of Social Contribution Processes and Social Contribution Resources
D.1. Management of Social Contribution Processes and Social Contribution Resources Main Process
Main Process Officers:
Academic unit managers and coordinators
Main Process Implementers
All academic staff and relevant administrative staff
Scope and Purpose of the Main Process
Social contribution policy of the organization Social contribution of the organization
management of processes and organizational structure
institutionalized. Management and management of social contribution processes
organizational structure is aligned with the organization's social contribution policy
is harmonized, job descriptions are defined. Functioning of the structure
monitored and related improvements are realized.
Main Process Inputs
Relevant legal and regulatory documents, board and commission decisions, meeting minutes and stakeholder opinions
Sub Processes
D.1.1. Management of social contribution processes
D.1.2. Resources
Main Process Outputs
News about the activity, photos, signature lists
Main Process Performance Indicators
Number of activities organized by application and research centers
Customer of the Main Process
All employees of the university, students, other stakeholders.
Supplier of the Main Process
All academic and administrative units, students, stakeholders